Section 261: Scheme of revival and rehabilitation

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 261

Section 261 historically governed the preparation and contents of schemes of revival and rehabilitation; omitted by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, its multi-faceted restructuring techniques were superseded by the Resolution Plan mechanism under Section 30 of the IBC.

  • Restructuring Modalities under Historical Schemes: Provided for capital reduction, debt rescheduling, asset divestment, amalgamations, and alteration of managerial control within a court-supervised scheme.
  • Multi-Stakeholder Claim Settlement: Required the scheme to provide balanced treatment for secured lenders, unsecured trade creditors, employees, and statutory dues.
  • Transition to Market-Driven Resolution Plans: Omitted by the IBC, replacing administrator-crafted schemes with competitive resolution plans submitted by private resolution applicants under Section 30 IBC.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India Ltd. v. Satish Kumar Gupta, (2020) 8 SCC 531: The Supreme Court detailed the mandatory statutory contents of resolution plans under Section 30(2) IBC, establishing that commercial distribution formulas are within the exclusive competence of the CoC.
  • Ghanashyam Mishra and Sons Pvt. Ltd. v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd., (2021) 9 SCC 657: Affirmed that modern turnaround plans extinguish all unadmitted and historical claims, granting the successful bidder a clean slate upon scheme approval.
  • Miheer H. Mafatlal v. Mafatlal Industries Ltd., (1997) 1 SCC 579: Foundational ruling establishing that judicial review of corporate restructuring schemes is supervisory, verifying procedural fairness without sitting in appeal over commercial terms.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

When drafting a corporate restructuring plan, practitioners handling solvent companies should utilize Section 230 of the Companies Act, while distressed entities must operate under Section 30 of the IBC, ensuring that the plan strictly adheres to the priority waterfall under Section 53 IBC.