Section 262: Sanction of scheme

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 262

Section 262 historically regulated the sanctioning of revival and rehabilitation schemes by the Tribunal; omitted by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, its sanctioning process was replaced by the approval of resolution plans under Section 31 of the IBC.

  • Creditor Approval Threshold: Required approval by creditors representing at least three-fourths in value before the scheme could be submitted to the NCLT for sanction.
  • Judicial Review and Sanction Order: Empowered the Tribunal to assess objections, modify terms, and grant final sanction, making the scheme binding on all parties.
  • Replacement by Section 31 of the IBC: Subsumed under Section 31 IBC, which mandates the NCLT to approve a resolution plan approved by a 66% majority of the CoC if it complies with Section 30(2) requirements.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • K. Sashidhar v. Indian Overseas Bank, (2019) 12 SCC 150: The Supreme Court established that the Tribunal's jurisdiction in sanctioning revival plans is strictly supervisory and non-merit-based, limited to verifying adherence to statutory conditions.
  • Maharashtra Tube Ltd. v. State Industrial & Investment Corp. of Maharashtra Ltd., (1993) 2 SCC 144: Emphasized that statutory scheme sanction provisions override individual creditor recovery efforts to achieve enterprise survival.
  • Kalpraj Dharamshi v. Kotak Investment Advisors Ltd., (2021) 10 SCC 401: Reaffirmed that the Tribunal cannot alter or reject a revival plan on commercial grounds once approved by the requisite majority of creditors.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In plan sanction proceedings before the NCLT, ensure all mandatory certificates from the Resolution Professional are placed on record confirming compliance with Section 30(2) IBC, thereby limiting the Tribunal's inquiry and insulating the order against appellate challenges.