Section 452 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: Reasons to be recorded

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Procedural Law
Statutory Mandate
Competent Criminal Court / Court of Session
Formerly Sec 412 CrPC
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 452

Section 452 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to Section 412 of the CrPC, 1973) mandates that every Sessions Judge, Chief Judicial Magistrate, or Executive Magistrate making an order of transfer or withdrawal shall record their reasons for doing so.

  • Mandatory Recording of Reasons: A Sessions Judge, Chief Judicial Magistrate, or Executive Magistrate making an order under Section 448, 449, 450, or 451 shall record their reasons for making it.
  • Judicial Accountability Safeguard: Prevents arbitrary, opaque, or politically influenced re-allocation of criminal cases.
  • Ground for Revisional Scrutiny: Failure to record reasons renders the transfer or withdrawal order vulnerable to revisional quashment.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Satish Khosla v. M/s. Eli Lilly Ranbaxy Ltd., (1998) 1 CTC 372: Held that recording reasons under Section 412 CrPC is mandatory; an unreasoned transfer order is arbitrary and liable to be set aside.
  • Abdul Nazar Madani v. State of T.N., (2000) 6 SCC 204: Reaffirmed that reason recording is the cornerstone of judicial transparency in case transfer proceedings.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

If a Sessions Judge or CJM transfers a high-stakes case without articulating reasons in the order sheet, challenge the transfer immediately in the High Court under Section 447/528 for violation of Section 452.