Section 2 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: Definitions

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Criminal Procedure
Judicial Establishment
High Court / Court of Session / Judicial Magistrate
Formerly Sec 2 CrPC
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 2

Section 2 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 provides the statutory definitions governing all criminal inquiries, investigations, trials, and judicial proceedings across Indian courts.

  • Process Issuance & Attendance: Section 2 codifies fundamental criminal procedural classifications, including bailable offence [clause (a)], charge [clause (b)], cognizable offence [clause (c)], complaint [clause (d)], inquiry [clause (g)], investigation [clause (h)], judicial proceeding [clause (i)], non-cognizable offence [clause (l)], summons-case [clause (w)], victim [clause (y)], and warrant-case [clause (z)].
  • Digital Infrastructure Jurisdiction: BNSS Section 2 formally incorporates electronic communication, digital signatures, and electronic records into the statutory architecture, harmonizing the procedural code with modern information technology and the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023.

Clause (y) reaffirms an expansive definition of 'victim', encompassing natural persons who have suffered any loss or injury caused by an alleged offence, as well as their legal guardians and heirs.

Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. (2014) 2 SCC 1: The Constitution Bench settled that the definition of a 'cognizable offence' under Section 2 mandates the automatic, non-discretionary registration of an FIR under Section 154 CrPC (Sec 173 BNSS) without inquiring into reliability at the threshold.
  • Hardeep Singh v. State of Punjab (2014) 3 SCC 92: Delineated the exact legal boundary between 'inquiry' under Section 2(g) and 'trial', holding that an inquiry encompasses all judicial proceedings conducted by a Magistrate prior to the framing of charges.
  • Mallikarjun Kodagali v. State of Karnataka (2019) 2 SCC 752: Affirmed the victim's substantive, independent procedural right to appeal against acquittal, holding that the statutory definition of 'victim' must be interpreted liberally to promote restorative justice.
Legal Commentary:

Section 2 provides the interpretive foundation for the entire criminal administration. The procedural trajectory of any matter—ranging from the police's power to arrest without warrant to the accused's entitlement to default bail—hinges entirely on the definitions set forth in this section.