Section 35 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: When police may arrest without warrant

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Procedural Safeguards
Police Powers & Rights
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class / High Court
Formerly Sec 41 & 41A CrPC
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 35

Section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 establishes the statutory powers, conditions, and strict procedural safeguards governing when a police officer may arrest a person without a warrant.

  • Statutory Powers & Jurisdiction: Section 35 incorporates statutory safeguards balancing law enforcement powers with Article 21 personal liberty.
  • Process Issuance & Attendance: Under sub-section (1)(a), police may arrest without warrant any person who commits a cognizable offence in their presence.
  • Inquiry & Trial Mechanism: Under sub-section (1)(b), for offences punishable with imprisonment of seven years or less, arrest is strictly conditional: the officer must have reason to believe the person committed the offence and must be satisfied that arrest is necessary to prevent further offences, ensure proper investigation, prevent evidence tampering, stop witness intimidation, or secure court presence.
  • Core Legal Standard: The officer must record reasons in writing for making or not making an arrest.

Crucially, sub-section (7) creates a special safeguard: no arrest can be made without prior permission of a Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) if the offence carries less than three years imprisonment and the person is infirm or over sixty years of age.

Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273: The Supreme Court mandated strict adherence to statutory arrest safeguards (now under Section 35 BNSS) for offences punishable up to 7 years; held that mechanical or routine arrests violate Article 21, directing magistrates not to authorize detention without verifying compliance.
  • D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal (1997) 1 SCC 416: Laid down constitutional benchmarks against custodial violence, requiring clear identification tags, arrest memos, medical checkups, and contemporaneous intimation of arrest to relatives.
  • Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI (2022) 10 SCC 51: Reaffirmed that non-compliance with statutory notice of appearance and arrest guidelines entitles the accused to immediate bail, exposing defaulting police officers to departmental action and contempt of court.
Legal Commentary:

Section 35 is the primary shield against arbitrary police incarceration in India. The mandatory issuance of a notice under Section 35(3) transforms arrest from a routine preliminary step into a measure of absolute necessity. For defense practitioners, challenging illegal arrest under Section 35 is fundamental to securing immediate bail under Section 480 or approaching the High Court for quashing.