Section 40: Burden of obligation imposing restriction on use of land or of obligation annexed to ownership but not amounting to interest or easement

Transfer of Property Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1882

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 40

Section 40 codifies the law of restrictive covenants running with land, providing that restrictive covenants and affirmative obligations may be enforced against transferees with notice or gratuitous transferees.

  • Restrictive Covenants Enforceability: Where, for the more beneficial enjoyment of his own immoveable property, a third person has, by contract, a right to restrain the enjoyment in a particular manner of the immoveable property of another.
  • Enforcement Against Transferees: Such right or obligation may be enforced against a transferee with notice thereof or a gratuitous transferee of the property affected thereby.
  • Bona Fide Purchaser Exception: Cannot be enforced against a transferee for consideration and without notice of the covenant.
  • Codification of Tulk v. Moxhay: Codifies the equitable doctrine of negative restrictive covenants binding purchasers in equity.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Tulk v. Moxhay, (1848) 2 Ph 774: The foundational English equity precedent codified in Section 40, holding that a covenant restraining building on land binds all subsequent purchasers taking with notice.
  • State of Rajasthan v. Basant Nahata, (2005) 12 SCC 77: Affirmed that Section 40 covenants run with the land in equity, preserving residential easements and architectural building schemes.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In gated communities and plotted developments, register the master declaration of restrictive covenants (height caps, residential-use-only restrictions) so every purchaser is fixed with constructive notice under Section 40.