Section 93: By and to whom notice should be given

Negotiable Instruments Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1881

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 93

Section 93 governs the mandatory notice of dishonour, enacting that when an instrument is dishonoured by non-acceptance or non-payment, the holder must give notice thereof to all parties whom they seek to make liable thereon.

  • Mandatory Condition Precedent: Notice of dishonour is strictly compulsory to charge the drawer and prior indorsers in civil recovery actions.
  • Discharge for Failure of Notice: Any party entitled to notice to whom notice is not given within a reasonable time is completely discharged from liability on the instrument.
  • Exception of Primary Debtors: Notice of dishonour is NOT required to be given to the maker of a promissory note or acceptor of a bill, as their liability is primary.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Sitaram v. Sadasheo: Held that failure to serve notice of dishonour under Section 93 completely releases the drawer and indorsers from all civil liability on the bill and underlying debt.
  • Caunt v. Thompson (1849): Affirmed that the purpose of Section 93 is to alert prior parties so they may take immediate protective steps against the primary debtor.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Do not confuse Section 93 with Section 138(b). Section 93 is the general civil requirement for all negotiable instruments; Section 138(b) is the specific 30-day statutory demand notice for cheque bounce prosecutions. In civil suits on bills and notes, plead Section 93 compliance explicitly.