Section 8: Holder

Negotiable Instruments Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1881

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 8

Section 8 defines the 'holder' of a promissory note, bill of exchange, or cheque as any person entitled in their own name to the possession thereof and to receive or recover the amount due thereon from the parties thereto.

  • Title in Own Name: The person must be entitled in their own name to possess the instrument; a mere custodian, agent, or servant holding paper does not qualify as a holder.
  • Recovery Right: Possesses the legal capacity to give a valid discharge and institute legal recovery proceedings against the maker, drawer, or prior indorsers.
  • Deceased or Insolvent Payee: Where the instrument is lost or destroyed, the person entitled at the time of loss remains the statutory holder for recovery purposes.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Braja Kishore Dikshit v. Purna Chandra Panda (AIR 1957 Ori 153): Held that benamidars or persons claiming through undisclosed principals cannot maintain an action as 'holder'; the title must be evident in the claimant's own name on the instrument.
  • B. Mohan Krishna v. Union of India (1996 Cr LJ 636): Affirmed that to maintain a statutory complaint under Section 138/142, the complainant must establish locus standi as the payee or statutory holder under Section 8.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Never file a Section 138 complaint or summary recovery suit in the name of an agent, collection manager, or partner without a registered Power of Attorney or explicit authorization on behalf of the statutory holder. Suits filed by non-holders are dismissed at the threshold.