Section 86: Parties not consenting discharged by qualified or limited acceptance

Negotiable Instruments Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1881

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 86

Section 86 regulates qualified or limited acceptances, enacting that if the holder of a bill of exchange acquiesces in a qualified acceptance, all prior parties who did not consent are discharged from liability.

  • Qualified Acceptance Definition: An acceptance is qualified if it is conditional, partial (paying part only), qualified as to place or time, or accepted by some but not all drawees.
  • Holder's Duty to Dissent: The holder is entitled to insist upon an absolute, unqualified acceptance; if offered a qualified acceptance, they may treat the bill as dishonoured.
  • Discharge of Non-Consenting Parties: If the holder accepts a qualified acceptance without the express consent of the drawer and prior indorsers, those prior parties are released.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Meyer v. Decroix [1891] AC 520: The House of Lords established that where an acceptor qualifies their acceptance, the holder accepts the qualification at their own peril regarding prior parties.
  • Bank of Baroda v. Punjab National Bank (AIR 1944 PC 58): Analyzed the legal effect of qualified bank acceptances on trade bills.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

If a drawee offers to accept a bill for Rs. 50,000 when drawn for Rs. 1,00,000, advise your client: do NOT accept without written permission from the drawer. Under Section 86, accepting the partial amount without permission destroys your remedy against the drawer for the balance.