Section 65: Power of the State Government to make rules

Motor Vehicles Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1988

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 65

Section 65 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 empowers State Governments to enact subordinate rules for Chapter IV concerning regional registering authorities, local fee structures, vehicle inspection mechanics, and administrative processes not exclusively occupied by Central rules.

  • State Rule-Making Competence: State Governments may formulate rules prescribing local registering authorities, their territorial jurisdictions, and procedural modalities for processing registration and fitness applications under Chapter IV.
  • Local Exemptions, Temporary Marks, and Fees: Governs the issuance of trade certificates to dealers, temporary registration marks within the State, inspection fees, and refund procedures for local registration taxes.
  • Subordination to Central Motor Vehicles Rules: State rules framed under Section 65 must remain strictly intra vires the Motor Vehicles Act and cannot conflict with, dilute, or override Central rules framed under Section 64.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • State of Karnataka v. Ganesh Kamath (1983) 2 SCC 402: The Supreme Court held that subordinate rule-making power conferred on State Governments cannot be exercised to impose conditions or restrictions repugnant to the substantive provisions of the parent statute.
  • Bimal Chandra Banerjee v. State of M.P. (1971) 1 SCC 670: The Supreme Court established the fundamental canon that delegated authority cannot create liabilities or procedural burdens that find no legislative sanction in the primary enactment.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In commercial disputes involving state-level delays in dealer trade certificates or registration clearances, review the relevant State Motor Vehicles Rules framed under Section 65. If a State rule imposes discriminatory fees or extraneous local documentation contrary to CMVR, challenge it under Article 226 citing Section 64 supremacy.