Section 7: Disability of one of several persons

Limitation Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1963

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 7

Section 7 of the Limitation Act, 1963 regulates the effect of legal disability where one of several persons jointly entitled to institute a suit or make an application is under a disability (minority, insanity, idiocy), governing whether time runs against all or is paused.

  • Discharge Without Concurrence Possible: Where one of several persons jointly entitled is under disability, and a discharge can be given without the concurrence of such person (e.g., managing partner, Karta of HUF), time will run against them all.
  • Discharge Without Concurrence Not Possible: Where no such discharge can be given without their concurrence, time will not run against any of them until one of them becomes capable of giving discharge without the concurrence of others, or until the disability ceases.
  • Joint Creditors & Claimants Scope: Applies to joint claimants, partners, joint decree-holders, and co-heirs holding joint and indivisible causes of action.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Sardara Singh v. Sardara Singh, (1990) 4 SCC 90: The Supreme Court held that Section 7 applies strictly to joint rights where a valid discharge can or cannot be given; where co-heirs hold separate and distinct shares, disability of one does not stop limitation for others.
  • Bapu v. Bapu, AIR 1980 Bom 341: Held that the Karta of a Hindu Undivided Family can give a valid discharge of a family debt, causing time to run against minor coparceners under Section 7.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

When representing minor plaintiffs claiming joint family property or partnership debts, determine whether any major adult co-claimant had legal power to give a valid discharge; if not, invoke Section 7 to defeat the limitation bar.