Home  /  Indian Succession Act  /  Section 95

Section 95: Bequest without words of limitation

Indian Succession Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1925
Section 94 All 391 Sections of Indian Succession Act Section 96

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 95

Section 95 enacts that where property is bequeathed to any person, he is entitled to the whole interest of the testator therein, unless it appears from the will that only a restricted interest was intended.

  • Statutory Period of Limitation: Section 95 abolishes the ancient feudal rule that required technical words of limitation (such as 'and his heirs') to confer an absolute, heritable estate.
  • Core Legal Standard: Under Section 95, a simple bequest of property—e.g., 'I give House X to my wife'—automatically conveys the entire interest which the testator had the power to dispose of in that property.

The legatee takes full, absolute, alienable, and heritable ownership. The presumption in favor of an absolute estate can only be displaced if the will, read as a whole, contains express words or necessary implications demonstrating that only a restricted, conditional, or life interest was intended. The burden of proving that an apparently absolute bequest is cut down to a limited estate rests heavily on the party asserting the limitation.

Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Sadhu Singh v. Gurdwara Sahib Narike, (2006) 8 SCC 75: The Supreme Court delivered an authoritative ruling on Section 95, holding that an omnibus bequest without words of limitation confers an absolute estate. To cut down an absolute gift to a life interest, the intention to restrict must appear with clarity from other parts of the will.
  • Balwant Kaur v. Chanan Singh, (2000) 6 SCC 310: The Supreme Court examined the interplay between Section 95 and Section 82, holding that while Section 95 presumes an absolute estate, the entire will must be examined to verify whether subsequent clauses created a valid remainder in favor of others.
  • Navneet Lal v. Gokul, (1976) 1 SCC 630: The Supreme Court held that the absence of words of limitation does not prevent a finding of an absolute estate under Section 95, rejecting archaic restrictions on female ownership.
Legal Commentary:

Section 95 is of paramount importance in cases involving bequests to female family members. Historically, opposing relatives argued that gifts to Hindu or Christian widows were inherently limited to life estates. The Supreme Court has firmly held under Section 95 that a bequest to a woman without limiting words confers an absolute estate with full power of sale. Litigators must use Section 95 to establish absolute ownership whenever words of limitation are absent.

Section 94 All 391 Sections of Indian Succession Act Section 96