Home  /  Indian Succession Act  /  Section 180

Section 180: Circumstances in which election takes place

Indian Succession Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1925
Section 179 All 391 Sections of Indian Succession Act Section 181

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 180

Section 180 codifies the celebrated equitable Doctrine of Election, enacting that where a testator professes to dispose of property which does not belong to him and gives other property to its true owner, the owner must elect either to confirm the will or retain their own property.

  • Core Legal Standard: Section 180 embodies the foundational equitable doctrine that a person cannot approbate and reprobate (accept benefits while repudiating burdens under the same instrument).
  • Operational Mechanism: Where a testator professes by will to dispose of property which does not belong to him, but belongs to person A, and by the same will gives a legacy or benefit to person A, person A cannot take the legacy under the will and at the same time assert independent ownership over their own property to defeat the testator's disposition.

Under Section 180, person A is put to their election: they must choose either: (1) to confirm the will, allowing their own property to pass to the designated legatee and accepting the testamentary benefit; or (2) to dissent from the will, retaining their own property, in which case they must relinquish the testamentary benefit given to them, which then devolves under Section 181 to compensate the disappointed legatee.

Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Pramod Kumar Jaiswal v. Bibi Husn Bano, (2005) 5 SCC 492: The Supreme Court delivered an exhaustive analysis of the Doctrine of Election under Section 180, holding that a person who takes a benefit under an instrument must also bear its burdens; they cannot accept the favorable parts of a document and repudiate the unfavorable parts.
  • Beepathuma v. Shankaranarayana Kadambolithaya, AIR 1965 SC 241: The Supreme Court affirmed that the doctrine of election under Section 180 is founded on the highest principles of equity, justice, and good conscience, applying across all communities to prevent a claimant from retaining both their own property and the testamentary gift.
  • C.V. Subba Rao v. C.V. Satyanarayana, AIR 1964 AP 322: The court held that under Section 180, election is triggered whenever the testator deals with property belonging to a beneficiary while conferring a separate benefit upon that same beneficiary.
Legal Commentary:

Section 180 is a master weapon in disputes involving joint family or disputed properties. Patriarchs frequently bequeath land belonging to a son or wife to a grandchild, while giving the son or wife cash or other assets. Under Section 180, the son or wife cannot claim the cash and then sue the grandchild to recover the land! They are legally compelled to choose. If they refuse to part with the land, they forfeit the cash.

Section 179 All 391 Sections of Indian Succession Act Section 181