Section 104: Orders from which appeal lies

Code of Civil Procedure • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1908
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 104

Section 104 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 specifies the orders from which an interlocutory appeal lies, establishing the statutory rule that no appeal lies from any other order except as provided in the Code.

  • Operational Statutory Mechanism: Sub-section (2) enacts an important restriction: 'No appeal shall lie from any order passed in appeal under this section.' This statutory bar prevents a 'second appeal against an order', ensuring that interlocutory appellate litigation terminates at the first appellate level.
  • Core Legal Standard: Section 104 operates as a strict statutory filter, enumerating the specific interlocutory and miscellaneous orders from which an appeal lies, and prohibiting any appeal beyond its express terms save as provided by law.

This statutory framework establishes clear operational guidelines, balancing legal compliance with procedural safeguards.

Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Shah Babulal Khimji v. Jayaben D. Kania, (1981) 4 SCC 8: The Supreme Court held that Section 104 and Order XLIII Rule 1 do not exhaust the right of appeal under Letters Patent of chartered High Courts; however, in subordinate courts, no appeal lies against an order unless specified in Section 104 or Order XLIII.
  • Kandla Export Corpn. v. OCI Corpn., (2018) 14 SCC 715: The Supreme Court affirmed that Section 104 strictly restricts interlocutory appeals, and sub-section (2) prohibits second appeals against orders.
Legal Commentary:

Section 104 operates as a strict filter. If an interlocutory order is not listed in Section 104(1) or Order XLIII Rule 1 (e.g. an order rejecting an application under Section 151 CPC or allowing an amendment under Order VI Rule 17), no statutory appeal lies, leaving the aggrieved party with the sole recourse of supervisory revision under Section 115 CPC or Article 227 of the Constitution.