Section 103: Power of High Court to determine issue of fact in second appeal

Code of Civil Procedure • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1908

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 103

Section 103 empowers the High Court in a second appeal to determine any issue of fact necessary for the disposal of the appeal if the evidence on record is sufficient and the issue was not determined or was wrongly determined by the courts below.

  • Fact-Finding Jurisdiction in High Court: In any second appeal, the High Court may, if the evidence on the record is sufficient, determine any issue necessary for the disposal of the appeal.
  • Two Statutory Triggers: Permitted only where: (a) the issue has not been determined by the lower appellate court or both courts below, or (b) the issue has been wrongly determined by reason of any decision on such questions of law as is referred to in Section 100.
  • Prerequisite of Sufficient Record: The High Court cannot record fresh evidence; it can only appreciate existing evidence on record to prevent unnecessary remand.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Hero Vinoth v. Seshammal, (2006) 5 SCC 545: The Supreme Court held that Section 103 allows the High Court to decide omitted or wrongly decided factual issues only after a substantial question of law has been formulated under Section 100.
  • Nazir Mohamed v. J. Kamala, (2020) 19 SCC 765: Reaffirmed that Section 103 is not an independent gateway to convert the High Court into a trial court of facts; it operates as an ancillary power to avoid remands.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

When a lower appellate court omits to decide a crucial issue of adverse possession or limitation on which full evidence exists on record, invoke Section 103 requesting the High Court to decide the issue directly rather than remanding the suit.