Home  /  Court Fees Act  /  Section 16

Section 16: Refund of fee where dispute settled under section 89 CPC

Court Fees Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1870
Section 15 All 36 Sections Schedules I & II Section 17

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 16

Section 16 of the Court-Fees Act, 1870 mandates the full refund of court fees where a dispute is settled through any of the alternative dispute resolution (ADR) modes specified in Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

  • Procedural Mechanism: Inserted by the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1999, Section 16 provides that where the court refers the parties to a suit to any one of the modes of alternative dispute resolution referred to in Section 89 of the CPC (arbitration, conciliation, judicial settlement including Lok Adalat, or mediation).
  • Statutory Rights & Obligations: The matter is settled, the plaintiff shall be entitled to receive back from the Collector a certificate authorizing full refund of the court fee paid in respect of the plaint.

Section 16 provides a powerful fiscal incentive for alternative dispute resolution, commanding the full refund of court fees whenever parties successfully settle their dispute under Section 89 CPC.

This provision creates a powerful financial incentive for amicable dispute resolution, rewarding litigants who conserve scarce judicial resources by returning the entire fiscal contribution deposited at institution.

Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. v. Cherian Varkey Construction Co. (P) Ltd., (2010) 8 SCC 24: The Supreme Court held that Section 16 must be implemented robustly to promote alternative dispute resolution under Section 89 CPC, entitling parties to complete refund of court fees upon successful settlement.
  • High Court of Judicature at Madras v. M.C. Subramaniam, (2021) 3 SCC 560: The Supreme Court purposively interpreted Section 16, holding that full refund of court fees is admissible even where parties arrive at a private out-of-court settlement without formal reference by the court under Section 89 CPC.
Legal Commentary:

The *M.C. Subramaniam* decision is a landmark development: parties who reach an amicable settlement privately out of court and withdraw the suit or file compromise terms are entitled to 100% refund of court fees under Section 16, placing private settlements on equal footing with formal Lok Adalat or court-annexed mediation settlements.

Section 15 All 36 Sections Schedules I & II Section 17