Section 142: Guarantee obtained by misrepresentation, invalid

Indian Contract Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1872

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 142

Section 142 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 vitiates and invalidates any contract of guarantee obtained by means of a misrepresentation made by the creditor, or made with the creditor's knowledge and assent, concerning a material part of the transaction. This provision enforces absolute commercial integrity upon lenders, penalizing false statements that induce a surety to assume financial liability.

  • Material Misrepresentation: The misrepresentation must relate to a material fact affecting the transaction, the financial condition of the borrower, the existence of underlying securities, or the terms of the credit facility.
  • Direct or Imputed Creditor Responsibility: The misrepresentation must either be made directly by the creditor (or its officers/agents) or made by the debtor/third party with the creditor's knowledge and assent.
  • Total Invalidation of Guarantee: Once statutory misrepresentation is established, the guarantee is rendered void ab initio; the creditor cannot enforce any part of the liability against the surety.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • National Provincial Bank of England v. Glanusk [1913] 3 KB 335: Celebrated English authority defining the threshold of disclosure and misrepresentation in guarantee transactions, holding that while a creditor is not bound to disclose everything, any positive statement that misleads the surety regarding the nature of the transaction invalidates the guarantee.
  • Balkrishna v. Bank of Bengal (1891) ILR 15 Bom 585: The Bombay High Court held that where a bank induces a surety to sign a guarantee by misrepresenting that previous defaults have been settled or that other securities are held in reserve, the guarantee is wholly invalid under Section 142.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In challenging a personal guarantee executed by a director or family guarantor, review all representations made in sanction letters, sanction terms, and facility agreements. If the bank falsely represented that co-guarantors or primary corporate collaterals were already in place, plead Section 142 to have the guarantee declared null and void.