Section 18: 'Misrepresentation' defined

Indian Contract Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1872
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 18

Section 18 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 defines 'misrepresentation', covering innocent or non-fraudulent false statements, breaches of duty that mislead another, and causing mistaken belief without intent to deceive.

  • Core Legal Standard: Section 18 defines misrepresentation, distinguishing innocent or negligent false statements from fraudulent deception under Section 17, and rendering the resulting contract voidable at the option of the misled party.
  • Operational Application: Section 18 (Misrepresentation) lies in mens rea: fraud involves an intent to deceive, whereas misrepresentation is committed innocently or negligently.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. Soonderdas Dhurumsey (1890) ILR 14 Bom 241: The Bombay High Court held that a statement made without sufficient verification, even if honestly believed, constitutes misrepresentation under Section 18 if it induces the other party to enter the contract.
  • Derry v. Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337: The House of Lords distinguished between fraudulent deceit and innocent misrepresentation, establishing that absence of dishonest intention precludes a finding of fraud but supports relief under misrepresentation principles.
Legal Commentary:

Under the exception to Section 19, if consent was caused by misrepresentation or fraudulent silence, the contract is NOT voidable if the aggrieved party had the means of discovering the truth with ordinary diligence. Consequently, commercial purchasers who neglect available due diligence opportunities may find their claim under Section 18 statutorily barred.