Home  /  Companies Act  /  Section 91

Section 91: Power to close register of members or debenture holders or other security holders

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Section 90 All 470 Sections of Companies Act Section 92
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)
Company Sec 2(20) Director Sec 2(34) Tribunal Sec 2(90)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 91

Section 91 authorizes a company to temporarily close its register of members, debenture holders, or other security holders for a maximum of forty-five days per year (and not exceeding thirty days at any one time) upon giving mandatory advance notice, establishing a definitive record window for corporate actions and dividend disbursements.

  • Statutory Closure Time Limits: Permits closure of registers for an aggregate period not exceeding forty-five days in each calendar year, subject to an individual cap of thirty days at any single time.
  • Mandatory Seven-Day Notice: Mandates giving at least seven days' prior notice by advertisement in an English and vernacular newspaper circulating in the district of the registered office, or such lesser period as prescribed by SEBI for listed entities.
  • Record Date Alternative: Modern corporate and SEBI practice allows fixing a single record date instead of prolonged book closure for determining voting, dividend, rights, or bonus entitlements.
  • Penal Sanctions for Illegal Closure: Closing the registers in violation of statutory notice or time thresholds attracts a penalty of five thousand rupees per day of default, up to a statutory ceiling of one lakh rupees on the company and every officer in default.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Killick Nixon Ltd. v. Dhanraj Mills (Pvt.) Ltd., (1983) 54 Comp Cas 432 (Bom): Held that statutory book closure under Section 91 freezes the membership list for specific corporate benefits; transfers lodged during the closure period take effect only upon reopening, protecting the company from conflicting claims.
  • SEBI v. Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd., (2003) 45 SCL 475 (Bom): Affirmed that listed companies must strictly coordinate book closure and record dates with stock exchanges under company law and listing regulations to maintain market transparency and prevent insider arbitrage.
  • T.V. Mathew v. Cochin Malabar Estates and Industries Ltd., (1988) 64 Comp Cas 358 (Ker): Held that the right of a shareholder to receive dividend depends strictly on being entered on the register of members on the closure or record date, and unregistered transferees cannot claim direct payment from the company.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In hostile takeover or contested dividend situations, verify that the board's resolution for book closure strictly adheres to the 7-day newspaper notice and statutory 30-day single closure limitation. Any book closure engineered to disenfranchise specific acquirers without statutory notice is void and can be challenged before the NCLT to secure interim stay orders against AGM proceedings.

Section 90 All 470 Sections of Companies Act Section 92