Section 387: Dating of prospectus and particulars to be contained therein

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 387

Section 387 regulates the issuance, circulation, and distribution of prospectuses by foreign companies offering securities for subscription in India, mandating full disclosure of corporate charters, management constitution, and material contracts.

  • Mandatory Dating and Signing: Prohibits the issuance, circulation, or distribution in India of any prospectus offering shares or debentures in a foreign company unless the prospectus is dated, signed, and contains prescribed disclosures.
  • Core Statutory Disclosures: Requires the prospectus to disclose the instrument constituting the company, statutory enactments under which it was formed, the address where the charter and its English translation may be inspected, and the date and country of incorporation.
  • Disclosures of Business History and Capital: Mandates disclosure of the company's capital structure, past business operations in India, director names and remunerations, and material contracts executed within the preceding two years.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Rex v. Kylsant, [1932] 1 KB 442: The English Court of Appeal affirmed criminal liability for prospectus fraud where a prospectus was false in a material particular because it omitted crucial financial realities, creating a misleading impression of corporate prosperity.
  • Derry v. Peek, (1889) 14 App Cas 337: Established the standard for fraudulent misrepresentation in prospectuses, holding that statements made without honest belief in their truth trigger civil liability for damages.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In investor class actions or suits under Section 37 challenging a foreign company's securities offer in India, plead specific omissions under Section 387. Establish that omission of material foreign contracts or undisclosed liabilities deprived Indian investors of informed consent, shifting the burden of proving bona fide disclosure onto the promoters.