Section 382: Display of name, etc., of foreign company

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 382

Section 382 imposes an affirmative obligation on every foreign company to conspicuously exhibit its name, country of incorporation, and limited liability status outside every office or place of business in India and on all business letters, notices, and official publications.

  • Conspicuous Physical Exhibition: Requires the foreign company to display its name and country of incorporation in legible English and local regional language characters outside every office, branch, or place where it carries on business in India.
  • Mandatory Inclusion in Commercial Documents: Mandates that all billheads, letterheads, notices, invoices, official publications, and transactional stationery state the corporate name, country of incorporation, and whether members' liability is limited.
  • Strict Liability Enforcement: Failure to exhibit or misrepresentation of limited liability status constitutes a statutory infraction attracting immediate monetary penalties under Section 392 without requiring proof of fraudulent intent.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Penrose v. Martyr, (1858) EB & E 499: Established that corporate identification and disclosure of limited liability on commercial documents is an absolute statutory duty intended to protect creditors and commercial counterparties from misapprehension.
  • Atkins & Co. v. Wardle, (1889) 58 LJ QB 377: Held that failure to state the precise corporate name and limited liability designation on bills and commercial correspondence renders the officers personally liable to contracting parties.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In contract enforcement or recovery suits against foreign corporate entities, scrutinize all pre-contractual emails, purchase orders, and invoices. If the foreign entity omitted its country of origin or limited liability status, raise this non-compliance in pleadings to counter any preliminary defense of extraterritorial jurisdictional immunity.