Section 36: Punishment for fraudulently inducing persons to invest money

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 36

Section 36 establishes strict criminal liability for fraudulently inducing persons to invest money, punishing deceptive forecasts, deliberate omissions, or reckless promises under the severe penal provisions of Section 447.

  • Fraudulent Mens Rea: Knowingly or recklessly making any statement, promise, or forecast that is false, deceptive, or misleading, or deliberately concealing material facts.
  • Actionable Inducement: Inducing another person to enter into, or offer to enter into, any agreement for acquiring, disposing of, subscribing for, or underwriting securities.
  • Punishment Under Section 447: Any person guilty of fraudulent inducement is punishable for corporate fraud under Section 447 with rigorous imprisonment up to ten years and non-compoundable statutory fines.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Sahara India Real Estate Corp. Ltd. v. SEBI, (2012) 10 SCC 603: The Supreme Court affirmed that enticing public deposits or debenture investments through misleading brochures constitutes corporate fraud punishable under the company statute.
  • Kanoria Chemicals & Industries Ltd. v. Registrar of Companies, (2016) 198 Comp Cas 112 (Cal): Held that reckless financial projections and deliberate non-disclosure of pending liabilities in an offer document attract prosecution under Section 36 read with Section 447.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In corporate fraud complaints filed before the Special Court, invoke Section 36 alongside Section 447. Complainants need not prove that the accused profited personally; demonstrating that false statements or concealed liabilities induced investment is sufficient to sustain conviction.