Section 35: Civil liability for misstatements in prospectus

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 35

Section 35 establishes personal civil liability for damages against directors, promoters, experts, and offerors where an investor subscribes for securities based on an untrue or misleading prospectus and suffers financial loss.

  • Civil Liability for Misstatement: Section 35 creates direct statutory tort liability, requiring directors, proposed directors, promoters, and authorized experts to pay compensation to every person who has subscribed for securities on the faith of a prospectus containing misleading statements.
  • Sub-Section (2) Provision: Sub-section (2) provides specific statutory defenses: proving that consent to become a director was withdrawn before issue, or that the prospectus was issued without authority or knowledge and prompt public notice was given upon learning of it, or that the statement was a correct representation of an expert's report whom the director had reasonable grounds to believe competent.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Sahara India Real Estate Corp. v. SEBI (2012) 10 SCC 603: The Supreme Court ordered the refund of over twenty-four thousand crore rupees with interest, affirming that investors misled by unauthorized or deceptive securities issuances are entitled to complete financial restitution.
  • Shiromani Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Debi Prasad AIR 1950 All 508: The court held that a subscriber seeking damages or repudiation of allotment must establish that a material misrepresentation of fact in the prospectus induced him to enter into the share contract.
Legal Commentary:

Section 35 provides civil restitution that operates concurrently with criminal sanctions under Section 34. In investor litigation and class action proceedings before the NCLT under Section 245, Section 35 enables aggrieved subscribers to hold promoters personally liable, piercing through corporate limited liability to satisfy investment losses caused by false prospectus statements.