Section 26: Matters to be stated in prospectus

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 26

Section 26 prescribes the statutory disclosures, financial reports, declarations, and expert consents that must be included in every registered prospectus before securities are offered to the public.

  • Core Legal Standard: Section 26 mandates that every prospectus issued by or on behalf of a public company must state matters and set out financial reports specified by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) in consultation with the Central Government.
  • Operational Mechanism: The prospectus must contain audited financial statements, reports on profits and losses, assets and liabilities, and declarations of compliance with the Act.

It must also contain written consent from experts (auditors, bankers, valuers, legal counsel) who are not connected with the formation or management of the company, ensuring third-party professional accountability.

Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Ltd. v. SEBI (2012) 10 SCC 603: The Supreme Court ruled that full, accurate, and unvarnished disclosure in a prospectus is an absolute legal mandate to protect investors from asymmetric information and market deception.
  • Derry v. Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337: The foundational English ruling establishing that a statement made in a prospectus without belief in its truth, or recklessly without caring whether it is true or false, constitutes fraudulent misrepresentation.
Legal Commentary:

The prospectus is an invitation to invest that creates strict fiduciary obligations. Section 26 aligns Indian statutory disclosure standards with SEBI (ICDR) Regulations, requiring total transparency regarding promoter backgrounds, litigation risks, and end-use of funds. Omission of material liabilities or inflated financial metrics directly exposes promoters and merchant bankers to criminal prosecution.