Section 80 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: Warrant forwarded for execution outside jurisdiction

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Procedural Law
Statutory Mandate
Competent Criminal Court / Court of Session
Formerly Sec 78 CrPC
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 80

Section 80 regulates the procedure when a warrant of arrest is to be executed outside the local jurisdiction of the court issuing it, allowing the court to forward the warrant by post or electronic means to the local Executive Magistrate or police chief.

  • Execution Outside Jurisdiction: Target person resides or is located in another district or state.
  • Transmission to Local Authorities: Court forwards warrant to Executive Magistrate, District Superintendent of Police, or Commissioner of Police having local jurisdiction.
  • Endorsement & Execution: The receiving authority endorses their name thereon and causes it to be executed by local police.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Inder Mohan Goswami v. State of Uttaranchal (2007) 12 SCC 1: The Supreme Court emphasised that inter-district execution of coercive processes requires strict routing through local magistrates or police chiefs to verify identity and prevent harassment.
  • State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh (1999) 6 SCC 172: Affirmed that formal institutional transmission prevents rogue enforcement across jurisdictional boundaries.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

When representing clients targeted by out-of-district warrants, check whether the issuing court forwarded the process under Section 80. If out-of-district police arrived directly without local intimation, raise procedural breach.