Section 425 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: Summary dismissal of appeal

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Procedural Law
Statutory Mandate
Competent Criminal Court / Court of Session
Formerly Sec 384 CrPC
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 425

Section 425 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to Section 384 of the CrPC, 1973) governs the summary dismissal of appeals, mandating that no appeal presented by an advocate shall be dismissed without giving the advocate a reasonable opportunity of being heard.

  • Threshold for Summary Dismissal: If upon examining the petition of appeal and copy of judgment, the Appellate Court considers that there is no sufficient ground for interfering, it may dismiss the appeal summarily.
  • Mandatory Hearing for Advocate: No appeal presented by the appellant or their advocate shall be dismissed summarily unless the appellant or their advocate has had a reasonable opportunity of being heard in support of the same.
  • Calling for Trial Record: Before dismissing an appeal summarily, the Court may call for the record of the case; in Sessions Court appeals, calling for the record is mandatory.
  • Reasoned Order Required: Summary dismissal must contain concise reasons demonstrating application of judicial mind.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Bani Singh v. State of U.P., (1996) 4 SCC 720: The Supreme Court held that the appellate court cannot dismiss an appeal for default of the advocate; the court must peruse the record and decide on merits, or appoint amicus curiae.
  • K.S. Panduranga v. State of Karnataka, (2013) 3 SCC 721: Reaffirmed that an appellate court must examine the record and decide the appeal on merits even if the appellant's counsel fails to appear.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

At the preliminary admission hearing of an appeal, highlight at least two arguable questions of law or manifest evidentiary misappreciations to prevent the court from invoking summary dismissal under Section 425.