Section 419 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: Appeal in case of acquittal

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Procedural Law
Statutory Mandate
Competent Criminal Court / Court of Session
Formerly Sec 378 CrPC
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 419

Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 governs appeals against acquittals and prescribes the requirement of obtaining leave to appeal.

  • Appellate Remedies & Forum: Section 419 regulates State and private appeals against acquittals: the District Magistrate or State Government may direct the Public Prosecutor to present an appeal to the Court of Session or High Court from an order of acquittal.
  • Sub-Section (3): High: Sub-section (3) provides that no appeal under this section to the High Court shall be entertained except with the leave of the High Court.

Sub-section (4) governs complaint cases: if an order of acquittal is passed in a case instituted upon complaint, the complainant must apply for special leave to appeal within six months (for public servants) or sixty days (for others).

Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Chandrappa v. State of Karnataka (2007) 4 SCC 415: The Supreme Court formulated golden principles for appellate review of acquittals: while the appellate court has full power to review evidence, the presumption of innocence is doubly reinforced by an acquittal; the appellate court must not interfere unless the trial court's view is palpably perverse or untenable.
  • Ghurey Lal v. State of U.P. (2008) 10 SCC 450: Reiterated that if two reasonable conclusions are possible on the basis of the evidence on record, the appellate court should not disturb the finding of acquittal.
Legal Commentary:

Section 419 safeguards the 'double presumption of innocence' earned by an acquitted person. When opposing an appeal against acquittal, the defense must establish that the trial court's view was a plausible, reasonable view based on evidence, even if another interpretation is conceivable.