Section 363 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: Trial of persons previously convicted of offences against coinage, stamp-law or property

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Procedural Law
Statutory Mandate
Competent Criminal Court / Court of Session
Formerly Sec 324 CrPC
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 363

Section 363 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to Section 324 of the CrPC, 1973) regulates the trial of persons previously convicted of offences against coinage, stamp-law, or property, providing for enhanced sentencing or committal to Court of Session.

  • Specific Offence Categories: Applies to persons accused of offences punishable under Chapter X (coinage/currency) or Chapter XVII (property theft/extortion/robbery) of BNS with imprisonment of three years or more.
  • Previous Conviction Trigger: Triggered if the accused has been previously convicted of an offence punishable under those Chapters with three years or upward.
  • Committal for Adequate Punishment: If the Magistrate cannot pass a sufficiently severe sentence, the Magistrate must commit the accused to the Court of Session unless authorized by CJM.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • State v. Ramlal, 1982 Cri LJ 1650: The High Court held that committal of habitual property offenders is intended to prevent recidivism and ensure that habitual criminals receive exemplary sentences from Sessions Courts.
  • Emperor v. Sheikh Abdul, AIR 1931 Bom 244: Emphasized that previous convictions must be strictly charged and proved before Section 324 CrPC committal powers can be invoked.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

When prosecutors invoke Section 363 to commit property cases to Sessions, scrutinize whether the prior conviction was under the specific qualifying chapters and whether substantive appeals are still pending against the prior order.