Section 353 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: Accused person to be competent witness

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Procedural Law
Statutory Mandate
Competent Criminal Court / Court of Session
Formerly Sec 315 CrPC
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 353

Section 353 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 provides that an accused person is a competent witness for the defense, preserving the constitutional protection against self-incrimination.

  • Evidentiary Proof & Admissibility: Section 353 provides that any person accused of an offence before a Criminal Court shall be a competent witness for the defence.
  • Inquiry & Trial Mechanism: May give evidence on oath in disproof of the charges made against them or any person charged together with them at the same trial.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Tahsildar Singh v. State of U.P. (AIR 1959 SC 1012): Affirmed that the right of an accused to testify in their own defense under Section 315 CrPC (Sec 353 BNSS) is purely voluntary; exercise of the right to remain silent can never be used to draw adverse inferences.
  • State of Maharashtra v. Sukhdeo Singh (1992) 3 SCC 700: Held that once an accused elects to step into the witness box, they are subject to cross-examination by the prosecution like any other witness.
Legal Commentary:

Section 353 requires delicate tactical judgment. Stepping into the witness box exposes the accused to prosecutorial cross-examination, which should only be advised when documentary alibis or affirmative defenses require direct sworn testimony.