Section 267 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: Evidence for prosecution

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Procedural Law
Statutory Mandate
Competent Criminal Court / Court of Session
Formerly Sec 244 CrPC
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 267

Section 267 prescribes the procedure for recording evidence for prosecution in warrant cases instituted otherwise than on a police report (private complaint cases), requiring the Magistrate to hear the prosecution and take all evidence produced (replacing Section 244 CrPC).

  • Private Complaint Warrant Trial: Warrant cases instituted on a private complaint under Section 223 BNSS.
  • Pre-Charge Evidence Stage: Magistrate hears the prosecution and takes all such evidence as may be produced in support of the complaint BEFORE framing of charge.
  • Issuance of Process to Witnesses: Magistrate may issue summons to any person to attend or produce any document on application of complainant.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • R.S. Nayak v. A.R. Antulay (1986) 2 SCC 716: The Supreme Court settled that in private complaint warrant trials, recording pre-charge evidence under Section 244 CrPC (Section 267 BNSS) is an indispensable prerequisite before charges can be framed.
  • Ajoy G. Patel v. State of Maharashtra (2000) 10 SCC 430: Held that the accused has an absolute right to cross-examine complainant witnesses at the pre-charge stage.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Crucial distinction: In complaint warrant cases, the accused has TWO opportunities to cross-examine: (1) At the pre-charge stage under Section 267; and (2) After charge framing under Section 269. Never waive cross-examination at the pre-charge stage if seeking discharge under Section 268.