Section 211 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: Transfer on application of accused

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Procedural Law
Statutory Mandate
Competent Criminal Court / Court of Session
Formerly Sec 191 CrPC

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 211

Section 211 mandates that when a Magistrate takes cognizance of an offence upon information received from any person other than a police officer, or upon their own knowledge under Section 210(1)(c), the accused must be informed of their right to have the case tried by another Magistrate.

  • Suo Motu / Informant Cognizance: Cognizance taken under Section 210(1)(c) without police report or formal complaint.
  • Mandatory Information to Accused: Accused must, before any evidence is taken, be informed that they are entitled to have the case tried by another Magistrate.
  • Transfer Mandate: If the accused objects to being tried by that Magistrate, the case MUST be transferred to the Chief Judicial Magistrate or another Magistrate.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • State of Bihar v. Ram Naresh Pandey AIR 1957 SC 389: The Supreme Court held that Section 191 CrPC (Section 211 BNSS) codifies the principle of judicial impartiality; a magistrate acting on personal knowledge cannot force an accused to submit to their trial.
  • A.R. Antulay v. R.S. Nayak (1988) 2 SCC 602: Reiterated that fair trial demands an unbiased forum; failure to inform the accused of this transfer right vitiates the trial.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

If a magistrate took suo motu cognizance under Section 210(1)(c) and proceeded to record evidence without appraising the client of their right to transfer under Section 211, the entire trial is illegal under Section 517 BNSS.