Section 183 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: Recording of confessions and statements

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Procedural Law
Statutory Mandate
Competent Criminal Court / Court of Session
Formerly Sec 164 CrPC
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 183

Section 183 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 governs the recording of confessions and witness statements by Judicial Magistrates, incorporating mandatory audio-video electronic recording.

  • Inquiry & Trial Mechanism: Section 183 prescribes the solemn procedure for recording confessions and statements during investigation.
  • Sub-Section (1): Judicial: Under sub-section (1), any Judicial Magistrate may record any confession or statement made to them in the course of an investigation.
  • Sub-Section (2) Provision: Sub-section (2) introduces a major technological safeguard: statements or confessions may be recorded by audio-video electronic means.

Sub-section (6) provides that in offences punishable with seven years or more, or sexual offences, the Magistrate must record the statement of the victim or witness as soon as the commission of the offence is brought to notice.

Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Shivappa v. State of Karnataka (1995) 2 SCC 76: The Supreme Court held that the statutory warnings and reflection time under Section 164 CrPC (Sec 183 BNSS) are mandatory; recording confessions without ensuring freedom from police influence renders the confession inadmissible.
  • Rabindra Kumar Pal v. Republic of India (2011) 2 SCC 490: Emphasized that the Magistrate must act as an independent judicial filter, actively questioning the confessor to detect hidden torture, psychological threats, or promises before recording.
  • State of Karnataka v. Shivanna (2014) 8 SCC 913: Mandated expeditious recording of rape victim statements under Section 164 to protect vulnerable witnesses from intimidation and preserve truthful testimony.
Legal Commentary:

Section 183 is the highest-value evidentiary procedure during criminal investigation. A properly recorded judicial confession is admissible as substantive evidence, whereas a witness statement under Section 183 provides an unshakeable benchmark to impeach hostile witnesses or support convictions.