Section 122 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: Certain transfers to be null and void

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Procedural Law
Statutory Mandate
Competent Criminal Court / Court of Session
Formerly Sec 105J CrPC
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 122

Section 122 declares that any transfer of property referred to in a show-cause notice issued under Section 119 shall be null and void, nullifying transactions designed to defeat forfeiture.

  • Issuance of Section 119 Notice: Notice to show cause has been formally issued by the court.
  • Prohibited Transfer: Selling, mortgaging, leasing, gifting, or creating any third-party charge on the property.
  • Statutory Voidness: Any such transfer is null and void in law, and does not shield the asset from subsequent forfeiture.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu v. Jagannath (1994) 1 SCC 1: Reaffirmed the principle that transactions designed to defeat judicial process and statutory attachments are void ab initio.
  • Aslam Mohammad Merchant v. Competent Authority (2008) 14 SCC 186: Affirmed that property transfers during pending forfeiture inquiries cannot defeat the sovereign claim.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Title search caution: Before purchasing real estate, buyers must verify that no Section 119 BNSS or PMLA attachment notices are pending against the vendor. Transactions executed after notice are completely void.