Section 98: Selling Child for Purposes of Prostitution

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita • Chapter V: Of Offences Against Women & Children • Official Statutory Text & Legal Guide

Chapter V: Of Offences Against Women & Children
Court of Session
Non-Bailable
Cognizable
Formerly Sec 372 IPC

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 98

Section 98 penalizes selling, letting to hire, or otherwise disposing of any child with intent that such child shall be employed or used for the purpose of prostitution or illicit intercourse, prescribing imprisonment extending up to ten years, and fine.

  • Commercial Disposition of Child: Selling, hiring out, or disposing of any child under eighteen years of age.
  • Prostitution or Illicit Intercourse Intent: Done with intent, or knowing it to be likely, that the child will be used for prostitution or illicit sexual exploitation.
  • Statutory Presumption of Intent: Section 98 Explanation creates a statutory presumption of unlawful intent when a child is sold to a brothel-keeper or trafficker.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Gaurav Jain v. Union of India (1997) 8 SCC 114: The Supreme Court issued historic directions regarding the rescue and rehabilitation of children of prostitutes and victims of commercial sexual trafficking under Section 372 IPC (Section 98 BNS).
  • Vishal Jeet v. Union of India (1990) 3 SCC 318: Directed all state governments to eradicate child prostitution and prosecute human traffickers under strict penal provisions.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In anti-human trafficking operations (AHTU), invoke the statutory presumption under Section 98 BNS: if a child was handed over to a brothel manager or massage parlor operator for money, commercial sexual intent is statutorily presumed.