Section 314: Dishonest Misappropriation of Movable Property

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita • Chapter XVII: Of Offences Against Property • Official Statutory Text & Legal Guide

Chapter XVII: Of Offences Against Property
Any Magistrate
Bailable
Non-Cognizable
Formerly Sec 403 IPC

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 314

Section 314 penalises dishonest misappropriation of movable property, punishing anyone who dishonestly misappropriates or converts to their own use any movable property (replacing Section 403 IPC).

  • Innocent Initial Possession: Property initially comes into possession innocently or without wrongful taking.
  • Dishonest Conversion: Subsequent formation of dishonest intent and conversion of property to one's own use.
  • Retaining or Disposing: Refusal to return to the rightful owner after knowledge of true ownership.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Ramaswami Nadar v. State of Madras AIR 1958 SC 56: The Supreme Court held that dishonest misappropriation differs from theft because initial possession is lawful; criminal liability arises upon subsequent dishonest conversion.
  • U. Dhar v. State of Jharkhand (2003) 2 SCC 219: Reiterated that civil money disputes or contractual retentions do not constitute criminal misappropriation without proof of dishonest intention.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Distinguish between civil retention under a bona fide claim of right and criminal conversion. For defence, show that the property was retained under a legitimate lien or pending accounting settlement.