Section 313: Belonging to a Wandering Gang of Persons Associated for Committing Thefts

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita • Chapter XVII: Of Offences Against Property • Official Statutory Text & Legal Guide

Chapter XVII: Of Offences Against Property
Magistrate 1st Class
Non-Bailable
Cognizable
Formerly Sec 401 IPC

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 313

Section 313 penalises belonging to any wandering or other gang of persons associated for the purpose of habitually committing theft or robbery.

  • Association with Gang: Membership in a habitual gang or group of persons.
  • Habitual Criminal Object: Associated specifically for the purpose of habitually committing theft or robbery.
  • Absence of Dacoity Aggravation: Distinguished from dacoity gangs by the scale and habitual itinerant nature of operations.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Lallu Manjhi v. State of Jharkhand (2003) 2 SCC 401: The Supreme Court held that proving membership in a criminal gang requires evidence of persistent association and habitual involvement in property offences.
  • State of Maharashtra v. Babulal (1993) Supp 3 SCC 419: Affirmed that isolated casual association is insufficient; there must be continuous criminal enterprise.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Prosecution must present charge sheets and conviction records in multiple previous theft cases to prove habitual association. Defence should demonstrate legitimate itinerant employment (nomadic traders, seasonal labourers).