Home  /  Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita  /  Section 261

Section 261: Escape from Confinement Negligently Suffered by Public Servant

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita • Chapter XII: Of Contempts of Lawful Authority of Public Servants • Official Statutory Text & Legal Guide

Chapter XII: Of Contempts of Lawful Authority of Public Servants
Any Magistrate
Bailable
Non-Cognizable
Formerly Sec 223 IPC
Section 260 All 358 Sections of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 262

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 261

Section 261 penalises a public servant legally bound to keep in confinement any person charged with or convicted of an offence, who negligently suffers such person to escape from confinement.

  • Lawful Custody: Lawful detention of a person charged with or convicted of an offence.
  • Duty of Care: Public servant responsible for guarding and securing the prisoner.
  • Negligent Escape: Failure to exercise ordinary diligence, vigilance, or security precautions, resulting in escape.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • State of M.P. v. Ramcharan (1977) 2 SCC 515: The Supreme Court held that negligence under this provision requires proof of gross dereliction of guarding duty, not mere accidental mishap.
  • Public Prosecutor v. G. Sadagopan AIR 1953 Mad 441: Held that falling asleep while on armed sentry duty outside a lockup constitutes culpable negligence under this section.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Defence counsel should establish equipment failure (broken handcuffs, inadequate lockup bars), severe understaffing, or physical assault by third parties that overpowered the guard.

Section 260 All 358 Sections of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 262