Section 260: Intentional Omission to Apprehend Person Under Sentence of Court

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita • Chapter XII: Of Contempts of Lawful Authority of Public Servants • Official Statutory Text & Legal Guide

Chapter XII: Of Contempts of Lawful Authority of Public Servants
Court of Session / Magistrate 1st Class
Non-Bailable (Death/Life) / Bailable (<10 Yrs)
Cognizable
Formerly Sec 222 IPC

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 260

Section 260 punishes a public servant legally bound to apprehend or keep in confinement any person under sentence of a court of justice, who intentionally omits to apprehend or suffers such person to escape.

  • Convicted Prisoner: The target is a person convicted and sentenced by a court of law.
  • Duty of Custody: Public servant charged with executing the sentence or maintaining custody.
  • Intentional Sufferance of Escape: Consciously releasing, facilitating, or permitting the convict to escape.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration (1980) 3 SCC 488: The Supreme Court highlighted that prison officials hold statutory custody over convicts and any corrupt collusion with convicts violates public duty.
  • State of Maharashtra v. Babulal (1993) Supp 3 SCC 419: Affirmed severe sentencing for jail wardens colluding in high-security prison escapes.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Differentiate between intentional escape (Section 260) and negligent oversight (Section 261). Check prison gate pass registers and guard duty rosters.