Section 206: Absconding to Avoid Service of Summons or Other Proceeding

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita • Chapter XI: Of Offences by or Relating to Public Servants • Official Statutory Text & Legal Guide

Chapter XI: Of Offences by or Relating to Public Servants
Any Magistrate
Bailable
Non-Cognizable
Formerly Sec 172 IPC

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 206

Section 206 penalises absconding in order to avoid being served with a summons, notice, or order proceeding from any public servant legally competent to issue the same.

  • Lawful Process: A competent public servant or court has issued a summons, notice, or order requiring appearance or compliance.
  • Knowledge of Process: The accused is aware or has reasonable grounds to believe that the process has been issued or is about to be issued.
  • Absconding: The accused hides, departs, or conceals their whereabouts specifically to defeat or evade service of process.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab (1994) 3 SCC 569: The Supreme Court observed that evading lawful court processes strikes at the root of the judicial administration and warrants prompt statutory cognizance.
  • Bhaiya Lal v. State of U.P. (1998) Cri LJ 3968 (All): Held that 'absconding' implies hiding from ordinary process; mere ordinary absence from home without knowledge of summons does not constitute an offence.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Complaints under Section 206 are governed by Section 215 BNSS (old Section 195 CrPC) and can only be instituted upon a written complaint by the issuing public servant or superior authority.