Section 205: Wearing Garb or Carrying Token Used by Public Servant with Fraud Intent

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita • Chapter XI: Of Offences by or Relating to Public Servants • Official Statutory Text & Legal Guide

Chapter XI: Of Offences by or Relating to Public Servants
Any Magistrate
Bailable
Cognizable
Formerly Sec 171 IPC

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 205

Section 205 criminalises wearing garb or carrying tokens used by public servants with the fraudulent intent that it may be believed that the person belongs to that class of public servants.

  • Prohibited Garb or Token: Wearing any dress, uniform, emblem, or carrying any token resembling that used by a public servant.
  • Absence of Authority: The person does not legally belong to that specific cadre or service.
  • Fraudulent Intent: Possessing the deliberate intention that onlookers believe the wearer is an authentic public servant.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Babulal v. State of Maharashtra (1993) Supp 3 SCC 419: Affirmed that deceptive visual resemblance designed to hoodwink the public into submitting to unlawful demands satisfies the statutory requirement of fraudulent intent.
  • State of H.P. v. Gian Chand (2001) 6 SCC 71: Reiterated that possession and display of security force insignia by unauthorised civilians is a serious threat to law and order, requiring strict penal enforcement.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Seizure memos under Section 185 BNSS must clearly record the recovered uniforms, belts, or badges with photographs. Defence counsel should assess whether the uniform was used for theatrical, cinematic, or innocent carnival purposes without fraudulent mens rea.