Section 29: Fast track procedure

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1996
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 29

Section 29 regulates decision-making by a multi-member arbitral panel and anchors the statutory time-limits governing domestic arbitral awards under Section 29A.

  • Arbitration Framework & Scope: Section 29 mandates that in arbitral proceedings with more than one arbitrator, any decision of the arbitral tribunal shall be made by a majority of all its members, while procedural questions may be decided by the presiding arbitrator if authorized by the parties.
  • Core Legal Standard: Working in tandem with Section 29A, it imposes strict temporal discipline, mandating completion of domestic arbitral awards within 12 months (extendable by 6 months with party consent).
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Rohan Builders (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Berger Paints India Ltd. (2024) INSC 686: The Supreme Court held that applications for extension of time under Section 29A can be entertained by courts even after the expiry of the statutory period; the tribunal's mandate does not irrevocably terminate the moment the calendar expires.
  • Harkirat Singh Sodhi v. Omaxe Ltd. (2023): Affirmed that the time limits governing arbitral proceedings under Section 29 and 29A enforce commercial accountability and protect arbitration from open-ended trial delays.
Legal Commentary:

Section 29 harmonizes collegial decision-making in multi-arbitrator tribunals. Coupled with statutory time discipline, it ensures that high-stakes commercial arbitrations proceed under structured majority voting within predictable timelines.