Section 28: Rules applicable to substance of dispute

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1996
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 28

Section 28 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 prescribes the rules applicable to the substance of the dispute, mandating that domestic arbitrations shall be decided in accordance with the substantive law in force in India, and requiring the tribunal to take into account the terms of the contract and trade usages.

  • Domestic Arbitration - Substantive Indian Law: Section 28(1)(a): In an arbitration other than an international commercial arbitration, the arbitral tribunal shall decide the dispute submitted to arbitration in accordance with the substantive law for the time being in force in India.
  • International Commercial Arbitration Autonomy: Section 28(1)(b): Parties may designate the rules of law applicable to the substance of the dispute; failing designation, the tribunal applies appropriate conflict-of-law rules.
  • Ex Aequo Et Bono Restriction: Section 28(2): Tribunal can decide ex aequo et bono (as amiable compositeur) only if parties have expressly authorized it to do so.
  • Terms of Contract and Trade Usages: Section 28(3): In all cases, the tribunal shall take into account the terms of the contract and trade usages applicable to the transaction.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Associate Builders v. Delhi Development Authority, (2015) 3 SCC 49: The Supreme Court held that an arbitrator must decide in accordance with the terms of the contract; an award that ignores specific contractual clauses or rewrites the contract violates Section 28(3) and is patently illegal.
  • Ssangyong Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd. v. NHAI, (2019) 15 SCC 131: The Supreme Court clarified that post-2015 amendment, Section 28(3) requires the arbitrator to 'take into account' the terms of the contract, meaning a plausible contractual interpretation cannot be interfered with, but an interpretation that no reasonable person could accept is patently illegal.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In final arguments before the arbitrator, anchor every claim and defense directly to specific contractual clauses and industry trade usages; an award that contradicts unambiguous contractual prohibitions is vulnerable to being set aside under Section 34.