Section 35: Election: Election when necessary

Transfer of Property Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1882

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 35

Section 35 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 codifies the equitable Doctrine of Election, enacting that a person who accepts a benefit under an instrument must also adopt the whole of it and surrender any inconsistent rights.

  • Core Legal Standard: Section 35 incorporates the equitable maxim 'allegans contraria non est audiendus' (a person cannot blow hot and cold / approbate and reprobate).
  • Statutory Rights & Obligations: Where a person professes to transfer property which he has no right to transfer, and as part of the same transaction confers any benefit on the owner of the property, such owner must elect either to confirm such transfer or to dissent from it.
  • Operational Mechanism: If he dissents, he must relinquish the benefit conferred, and the benefit reverts to the transferor or his representative as if it had not been disposed of.

If the transfer is for consideration, the disappointed transferee is entitled to reasonable compensation from the transferor.

Key Landmark Precedents:
  • C. Beepathuma v. Velasari Shankaranarayana Kadambolithaya (AIR 1965 SC 241): The Supreme Court held that the doctrine of election codified in Section 35 is founded on the principle that he who accepts a benefit under a deed or will must adopt the whole contents of the instrument, conforming to all its provisions and renouncing every right inconsistent with it.
  • Mumbai International Airport Pvt Ltd v. Golden Chariot Airport (2010) 10 SCC 422: The Supreme Court reaffirmed that the common law doctrine of election and the rule against approbation and reprobation applies strictly across Indian civil and property litigation; a party cannot accept the advantageous portions of a transaction while repudiating the burdens.
  • Cooper v. Cooper (1874) LR 7 HL 53: The House of Lords laid down the foundational common law principle that a person taking under an instrument must give full effect to that instrument so far as they have power.
Legal Commentary:

Section 35 frequently arises in family partition suits and wills where a testator or patriarch attempts to devise property belonging to a family member while simultaneously conferring ancestral cash or other lands on that same member. The beneficiary cannot pocket the gift while challenging the patriarch's authority to dispose of their property; they must make a binding statutory election.