Home  /  Indian Stamp Act  /  Section 75

Section 75: Power to make rules generally to carry out Act

Indian Stamp Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1899
Section 74 All 78 Sections Schedule I (Arts 1–65) Section 76

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 75

Section 75 confers broad plenary rule-making power upon the State Government to frame procedural and administrative regulations generally to carry out all the purposes of the Indian Stamp Act within the State.

  • Plenary Rule-Making Delegation: Empowers the State Government to make rules generally to carry out the purposes of the Act, covering impounding procedures, document custody, valuation adjudications, and stamp refund mechanisms.
  • Implementation of E-Stamping and Digital Systems: Provides the statutory enabling umbrella under which modern States have enacted e-stamping rules, digital certificate verification, and electronic collection protocols.
  • Subordination to Primary Legislation: Rules framed under Section 75 cannot contradict, enlarge, or curtail the substantive charging sections or liability thresholds fixed by the parent Act.
  • Procedural Safeguards and Ultra Vires Doctrine: Any administrative rule framed under Section 75 that imposes arbitrary preconditions on document admissibility or abrogates statutory refund rights under Chapter V is ultra vires and liable to be struck down.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Government of A.P. v. P. Laxmi Devi, (2008) 4 SCC 720: The Supreme Court recognized that Section 75 authorizes the executive to formulate robust procedural frameworks to ensure efficient collection of stamp duties, emphasizing judicial deference to fiscal regulatory mechanisms unless manifestly arbitrary.
  • Agricultural Market Committee v. Shalimar Chemical Works Ltd., (1997) 5 SCC 516: The Supreme Court held that the power to make rules to carry out the purposes of an Act does not authorize the delegate to widen the scope of the parent Act or impose burdens beyond statutory intent.
  • State of Uttarakhand v. Harpal Singh, (2011) 14 SCC 575: The Supreme Court affirmed that procedural rules framed under Section 75 cannot override or dilute the mandatory limitation periods prescribed by substantive statutory provisions like Section 50.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

When a State Revenue Department issues administrative circulars or executive guidelines imposing onerous requirements (such as demanding upfront bank guarantees before entertaining Section 45 refund applications or restricting e-stamp validity to 6 months contrary to the Stamp Act), challenge the circular under Section 75 via an Article 226 writ petition as ultra vires the parent statute.

Section 74 All 78 Sections Schedule I (Arts 1–65) Section 76