Home  /  Indian Stamp Act  /  Section 36

Section 36: Admission of instrument where not to be questioned

Indian Stamp Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1899
Section 35 All 78 Sections Schedule I (Arts 1–65) Section 37

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 36

Section 36 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 establishes that once an instrument has been admitted in evidence, such admission shall not be called in question at any subsequent stage of the suit or proceeding on the ground of deficit stamp duty.

  • Evidentiary Proof & Admissibility: Section 36 enacts a statutory rule of finality: 'Where an instrument has been admitted in evidence, such admission shall not, except as provided in section 61, be called in question at any stage of the same suit or proceeding on the ground that the instrument has not been duly stamped.' The section creates an absolute statutory estoppel protecting judicial proceedings from retrospective disruption.
  • Evidentiary Presumption & Proof: The legislative intent is that stamp objections are fiscal matters intended for the benefit of State revenue, not procedural weapons for litigants to derail trials. Once the trial judge applies their judicial mind and marks the document as an exhibit in evidence, the controversy regarding its admissibility on the ground of stamp duty is irrevocably closed for all subsequent stages, including first appeal, second appeal, and revision.

Section 36 establishes that once an instrument is admitted in evidence, its admission cannot be questioned on grounds of deficit stamp duty at any later stage of trial.

Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Javer Chand v. Pukhraj Surana, AIR 1961 SC 1655: The seminal 5-Judge Constitution Bench ruling held that once a document has been admitted in evidence by the court and marked as an exhibit, Section 36 puts a complete quietus; the objection that the document is unstamped or insufficiently stamped cannot be raised at any subsequent stage or in the appellate court.
  • Shyamal Kumar Roy v. Sushil Kumar Agarwal, (2006) 11 SCC 331: The Supreme Court clarified that Section 36 applies only when the document has been formally admitted in evidence after judicial determination; an objection to stamp duty must be raised before the document is admitted and marked.
  • Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat, (2001) 3 SCC 1: The Court reiterated that while tentative exhibits can be marked for other evidentiary objections, stamp duty objections must be decided definitively at the time of admission under Section 35.
Legal Commentary:

Section 36 is the most critical tactical provision in civil trials. A party seeking to exclude an unstamped document must raise their objection *the instant* the document is tendered in the witness box. If counsel fails to object and the document is formally admitted and marked as an exhibit, Section 36 permanently bars any subsequent objection in appeal or revision.

Section 35 All 78 Sections Schedule I (Arts 1–65) Section 37