(1) A contract, otherwise proper to be specifically enforced, may be so enforced, though a sum be named in it as the amount to be paid in case of its breach, and the party in default is willing to pay the same, if the court, having regard to the terms of the contract and other attending circumstances, is satisfied that the sum was named only for the purpose of securing performance of the contract and not for the purpose of giving to the promisor an option of paying money in lieu of specific performance.
(2) When enforcing specific performance under this section, the court shall not also decree payment of the sum so named in the contract.
Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 23
Section 23 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 clarifies that the naming of a specified sum as liquidated damages or penalty in the contract in case of breach is not a bar to a decree for specific performance.
When defending against a defaulting seller who argues 'I will pay double the earnest money as liquidated damages under clause 10, so specific performance cannot be claimed', cite Section 23 and P. D'Souza to demonstrate that liquidated clauses do not extinguish specific performance.