Section 22: Restitution of conjugal rights

Special Marriage Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1954

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 22

Section 22 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 provides the remedy of restitution of conjugal rights for civil marriages.

  • Statutory Relief & Application: Section 22 provides that when either the husband or the wife has, without reasonable excuse, withdrawn from the society of the other, the aggrieved party may apply by petition to the District Court for restitution of conjugal rights.
  • Judicial Powers & Orders: Court, on being satisfied of the truth of the statements made in such petition, and that there is no legal ground why the application should not be granted, may decree restitution of conjugal rights accordingly.
  • The Explanation: The Explanation places the burden of proving a 'reasonable excuse' squarely on the person who has withdrawn from cohabitation.

This statutory framework establishes clear operational guidelines, balancing legal compliance with procedural safeguards.

Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Saroj Rani v. Sudarshan Kumar Chadha (1984) 4 SCC 90: The Supreme Court's constitutional validation of restitution of conjugal rights applies with equal force to Section 22 of the Special Marriage Act, establishing that the remedy aims at matrimonial reconciliation rather than coerced sexual intercourse.
  • T. Sareetha v. T. Venkata Subbaiah (AIR 1983 AP 356): The historical constitutional challenge to restitution on bodily privacy grounds, subsequently harmonized by the Supreme Court in Saroj Rani.
Legal Commentary:

Section 22 functions identically to Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act. In contested matrimonial litigation under the SMA, it is frequently utilized by abandoned spouses to establish a formal record of desertion, defend against maintenance claims, or lay the groundwork for divorce after the expiration of one year.