Section 17: Application against measures to recover secured debts

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (SARFAESI) Act, 2002 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Borrower's Statutory Remedy
DRT Challenge (45 Days)
Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT)
Act 2002

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 17

Section 17 confers a statutory right of appeal/application upon any aggrieved person, including borrowers and tenants, to challenge Section 13(4) enforcement measures before the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT).

  • Statutory Relief & Application: Under Section 17(1), any person (including the borrower) aggrieved by any measure taken under Section 13(4) may file a Securitisation Application (SA) before the DRT within 45 days.
  • Procedural Mechanism: The DRT is empowered to examine whether the measures taken by the secured creditor comply with the Act and Rules (including valuation, notice, and auction procedures).
  • Core Legal Standard: If the DRT finds the creditor's measures illegal, under Section 17(3) it can restore possession of the asset to the borrower and declare the auction invalid.

Section 17(4A) (inserted in 2016) specifically vests DRT with exclusive jurisdiction to adjudicate tenancy and leasehold claims.

Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Mardia Chemicals Ltd. v. Union of India (2004) 4 SCC 311: The Supreme Court struck down Section 17(2) which mandated a 75% pre-deposit to approach the DRT as unconstitutional, unreasonable, and oppressive, making access to the DRT under Section 17 unconditional.
  • United Bank of India v. Satyawati Tondon (2010) 8 SCC 110: Held that High Courts must not entertain Article 226 writ petitions against SARFAESI measures where an effective statutory remedy exists under Section 17 before the DRT, condemning indiscriminate writ interference.
  • Celir LLP v. BAFNA Motors (Mumbai) Pvt. Ltd. (2024) 2 SCC 1: The Supreme Court held that the right of redemption under Section 13(8) extinguishes upon the publication of the auction notice; neither the DRT nor the High Court can allow the borrower to redeem the property after auction publication.
Legal Commentary:

Section 17 provides the essential judicial check against executive banking excess. Because banks enforce security without prior court decree under Section 13, Section 17 guarantees post-measure judicial review before the DRT, ensuring strict compliance with statutory safeguards.