Section 25: Monitoring and reporting

Right to Information Act, 2005 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2005

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 25

Section 25 establishes a comprehensive annual monitoring, reporting, and legislative accountability framework, mandating the Central and State Information Commissions to submit annual reports on the implementation of the Act to the appropriate Government for tabling before Parliament or State Legislatures.

  • Mandatory Annual Implementation Report: Under Section 25(1), the Central Information Commission and State Information Commissions must annually prepare a comprehensive report on the implementation of the provisions of the Act during each year and submit it to the appropriate Government.
  • Mandatory Statistical Metrics under Section 25(3): Each report must contain comprehensive empirical metrics: (a) number of requests made to each public authority; (b) number of decisions where requests were rejected and the specific sections of the Act invoked; (c) number of appeals and complaints filed; (d) disciplinary actions recommended or taken against officers; (e) quantum of penalties collected under Section 20; and (f) efforts made by public authorities to administer and implement the Act.
  • Mandatory Legislative Tabling under Section 25(4): The appropriate Government must, as soon as practicable after the end of each year, cause a copy of the Commission's report to be laid before each House of Parliament or the State Legislature, ensuring direct democratic legislative oversight over administrative transparency.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Anjali Bhardwaj v. Union of India (2019) 18 SCC 246: The Supreme Court stressed that monitoring and reporting under Section 25 are vital to democratic accountability, directing the CIC and all SICs to ensure the timely compilation, publication, and online hosting of detailed annual performance reports and compliance data.
  • Common Cause v. Union of India (2018 SCC OnLine SC 3169): The Supreme Court observed that the failure of state governments to table Section 25 annual reports before State Legislatures subverts parliamentary scrutiny of the transparency regime and ordered immediate compliance.
  • Kishanlal Gera v. State of Haryana (2015 SCC OnLine P&H 10452): The High Court emphasized that public authorities are statutorily obligated to furnish complete annual reporting data to State Information Commissions under Section 25(2), and failure to do so attracts administrative sanction.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In public interest litigations challenging systemic delays, backlogs, or widespread non-compliance by public authorities, rely upon the empirical disclosures contained in the Section 25 annual reports. Rejection patterns, disproportionate invocations of Section 8(1)(j), and failure to collect Section 20 penalties documented in Commission reports serve as admissible statutory admissions establishing systemic administrative failure.