Section 16: Term of office and conditions of service

Right to Information Act, 2005 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2005

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 16

Section 16 prescribes the term of office, conditions of service, salaries, and allowances of the State Chief Information Commissioner and State Information Commissioners, as modified by the Right to Information (Amendment) Act, 2019.

  • Tenure Alteration Post-2019 Amendment: Under Section 16(1) and 16(2), the earlier fixed five-year statutory term was amended in 2019 to 'for such term as may be prescribed by the Central Government', capped at age 65, with an absolute prohibition against reappointment; the RTI Rules, 2019 prescribe a uniform three-year tenure.
  • Severance of State Chief Secretary Parity: The 2019 Amendment deleted Section 16(5)'s original statutory equivalence linking SCIC salaries to Election Commissioners and SIC salaries to the Chief Secretary of the State, delegating salary determination to the Central Government under the 2019 Rules (fixed at Rs. 2,25,000 per month).
  • Protection Against Disadvantageous Alteration & Pension Deduction: Section 16(5) proviso mandates that conditions of service shall not be varied to the disadvantage of an incumbent Commissioner after appointment; provisos to Section 16(3) mandate deduction of prior central/state government or judicial pensions from the Commissioner's salary.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Anjali Bhardwaj v. Union of India (2019) 18 SCC 246: Reiterated that the terms of service and functioning of State Information Commissions must not be crippled by executive inaction or delayed appointments, directing states to ensure full operational capacity.
  • Common Cause v. Union of India (2018 SCC OnLine SC 3169): The Supreme Court recognized that statutory independence of State Commissions is directly correlated to the certainty of their tenure and conditions of service.
  • Union of India v. Association for Democratic Reforms (2002) 5 SCC 294: Held that democratic transparency requires institutions charged with overseeing public disclosure to remain insulated from executive financial and administrative pressure.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In proceedings involving State Commission appointments or service matters, ensure that the State Government does not purport to legislate or prescribe terms in conflict with the Central Government's RTI Rules, 2019, as the 2019 Amendment exclusively reserved the power to prescribe terms to the Central Government. Moreover, sitting State Commissioners cannot suffer unilateral reductions in allowances or housing facilities during their term by virtue of the non-diminution proviso of Section 16(5).